Search Dental Tribune

Irrigating the root canal: A case report

Post-operative radiograph (Image: Dr Vittorio Franco, UK and Italy)
Dr Vittorio Franco, UK and Italy

Dr Vittorio Franco, UK and Italy

Mon. 22 January 2018

save

The patient reported on in this article is a student in dentistry and his parents are both dentists. They referred their son to a good endodontist, who then referred the case to me. As always, peers are more than welcome in either of my practices, in Rome and London, so when I treated this case, I had three dentists watching me, a future dentist on the chair, placing a great deal of pressure on me.

The 22-year-old male patient had a history of trauma to his maxillary incisors and arrived at my practice with symptoms related to tooth #21. The tooth, opened in an emergency by the patient’s mother, was tender when prodded, with a moderate level of sensitivity on the respective buccal gingiva. Sensitivity tests were negative for the other central incisor (tooth #12 was positive), and a periapical radiograph showed radiolucency in the periapical areas of both of the central incisors. The apices of these teeth were quite wide and the length of teeth appeared to exceed 25 mm.

My treatment plan was as follows: root canal therapy with two apical plugs with a calcium silicate-based bioactive cement. The patient provided his consent for the treatment of the affected tooth and asked to have the other treated in a subsequent visit.

After isolating with a rubber dam, I removed the temporary filling, and then the entire pulp chamber roof with a low-speed round drill. The working length was immediately evaluated using an electronic apex locator and a 31 mm K-type file. The working length was determined to be 28 mm.

As can be seen in the photographs, the canal was actually quite wide, so I decided to only use an irrigating solution and not a shaping instrument. Root canals are usually shaped so that there will be enough space for proper irrigation and a proper shape for obturation. This usually means giving these canals a tapered shape to ensure good control when obturating. With open apices, a conical shape is not needed, and often there is enough space for placing the irrigating solution deep and close to the apex.

I decided to use only some syringes containing 5 per cent sodium hypochlorite and EDDY, a sonic tip produced by VDW, for delivery of the cleaning solution and to promote turbulence in the endodontic space and shear stress on the canal walls in order to remove the necrotic tissue faster and more effectively. After a rinse with sodium hypochlorite, the sonic tip was moved to and from the working length of the canal for 30 seconds. This procedure was repeated until the sodium hypochlorite seemed to become ineffective, was clear and had no bubbles. I did not use EDTA, as no debris or smear layer was produced.

I suctioned the sodium hypochlorite, checked the working length with a paper point and then obturated the canal with a of 3 mm in thickness plug of bioactive cement. I then took a radiograph before obturating the rest of the canal with warm gutta-percha. I used a compomer as a temporary filling material.

The symptoms resolved, so I conducted the second treatment only after some months, when the tooth #11 became tender. Tooth #21 had healed. I performed the same procedure and obtained the same outcome (the four-month follow-up radiograph showed healing).

Editorial note: A complete list of references are available from the publisher. This article was published in roots - international magazine of endodontology No. 04/2017.

One thought on “Irrigating the root canal: A case report

  1. The ultimate reason why root canals fail is bacteria. If our mouths were sterile there would be no decay or infection, and damaged teeth could, in ways, repair themselves. So although we can attribute nearly all root canal failure to the presence of bacteria, I will discuss five common reasons why root canals fail, and why at least four of them are mostly preventable.

To post a reply please login or register

Oral health-related quality of life in head and neck cancer: What a new systematic review reveals

A new study has underscored the pivotal role played by dental professionals in contributing to the overall health and well-being of individuals affected by head and neck cancers. (Image: anut21ng Stock/Adobe Stock)

Thu. 27 November 2025

save

ABERDEEN, Scotland: Head and neck cancer is a highly debilitating disease that has profound consequences for oral function, nutrition, communication and psychosocial well-being. Dentists are central to both the early detection of these cancers as well as the treatment of the oral structures that they may affect. A newly published systematic review offers the most comprehensive overview to date of how head and neck cancer affects patients’ oral health-related quality of life (OHQoL).

Drawing on 101 studies published between 2001 and 2024, the study highlights the wide-ranging impacts of diagnosis, treatment and rehabilitation on daily function and well-being. The researchers identified significant variation in OHQoL depending on patient characteristics, tumour site and treatment modality. Socio-economic status emerged as a consistent predictor: individuals with lower income, limited education or reduced social support experienced markedly poorer outcomes, a suite of factors found in a recent regional study on the topic. Being underweight and struggling to maintain adequate nutrition were also associated with worse OHQoL, underscoring the need for early dietary intervention.

In terms of anatomical site in the oral cavity, the tongue and the floor of the mouth were linked with the most compromised OHQoL, and maxillary defects generally resulted in better rehabilitation outcomes than mandibular defects did. Regarding the effects of treatment modality on OHQoL, radiotherapy, whether primary or adjuvant, was repeatedly associated with deterioration in OHQoL, largely owing to mucositis, xerostomia, dysphagia and taste disturbances. Radiation dose and technique further influenced severity of symptoms.

The review also highlighted the importance of psychological well-being for OHQoL, finding that anxiety, depression and sleep disturbance were common among patients reporting poor OHQoL. This reinforces the need for integrated psychological support throughout treatment.

Postoperative rehabilitation showed clear benefits. Prosthetic interventions—including obturators, overdentures, palatal augmentation prostheses and implant-supported solutions—were consistently effective in improving functional and psychosocial outcomes. However, the review emphasised that improvements varied by defect type and surgical reconstruction method.

Based on the findings, the authors recommended routine OHQoL assessment from diagnosis onwards, arguing that targeted nutritional, psychological and rehabilitative support can significantly improve patient outcomes. Their findings also point to major research gaps, particularly in low-income regions where head and neck cancer burden is high but OHQoL data remains scarce.

The study, titled “Oral health–related quality of life in head and neck cancer: A systematic review”, was published online on 18 November 2025 in Frontiers in Oral Health.

Topics:
Tags:
To post a reply please login or register
advertisement
advertisement